World

Leadership of U.N. Human Rights Body Becomes Proxy Battle for World Powers

Advertisement


GENEVA — The annual alternative of who will steer the United Nations’ high human rights group is often accomplished quietly and by consensus. For months, this yr’s choice appeared to comply with that script.

Advertisement

Till per week in the past, that’s, when an surprising contest emerged over the 2021 presidency of the group, the U.N. Human Rights Council. The place — which holds vital sway over a physique that, regardless of its title, consists of a number of the world’s worst rights abusers — rotates by area, and is because of be crammed subsequent yr by a member of the Asia-Pacific bloc of nations.

The dispute over the council presidency is pitting a number of the U.N.’s strongest member states in opposition to tiny Pacific Island nations, and is taking part in out as U.N. members jockey for affect in anticipation of a brand new, extra engaged American administration.

Advertisement

For months, the one introduced candidate to guide the council subsequent yr was Fiji’s U.N. ambassador, Nazhat Shameem Khan, the nation’s first feminine Excessive Courtroom decide, a former prosecutor and a diplomat effectively regarded by Western nations.

However three days earlier than the deadline for functions, one other member of the regional bloc, Bahrain, tossed its hat within the ring and advised Fiji to step apart, setting off a spherical of infighting.

Advertisement

Bahrain is intently aligned with Saudi Arabia, whose human rights report — together with the state-sponsored killing of the dissident Jamal Khashoggi — is unhealthy sufficient that it suffered an embarrassing defeat this fall when it sought solely a seat on the council. Syria, a member of the bloc aligned with Russia and with an extended and infamous report of abuses, additionally pledged to dam Fiji.

“That was fairly a shock,” Doreen de Brum, a diplomat from one other Pacific nation, the Marshall Islands, stated of the opposition. “We thought Fiji can be the only title.”

Advertisement

Geneva-based diplomats interpret opposition to Fiji’s candidacy as an effort by China, Russia and Saudi Arabia to place the council’s presidency within the fingers of a compliant state because the position of the US takes new form underneath the incoming Biden administration.

“They really feel they’re shedding management,” Marc Limon, a former diplomat and director of the Common Rights Group, a suppose tank, stated of opponents to Fiji’s candidacy.

Advertisement

“The lengths they went to and the extent of subterfuge employed to drag this off suggests they’d one eye on a Biden administration return to the council,” Mr. Limon added. China, particularly, has tried to benefit from America’s absence from the council to develop its affect.

The Geneva-based Human Rights Council, whose mission is to advertise and shield rights, consists of representatives from 47 nations elected to staggered three-year phrases.

Advertisement

As a member for 2 years, Fiji has backed investigations into reported abuses in Venezuela, Belarus, Syria and Yemen — the type of country-specific resolutions which have been fiercely denounced by China and others.

The problem has specific resonance as 2021 looms. Western governments hope the United States will re-engage with the council underneath President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr., filling a vacuum left when the Trump administration walked out on the physique in 2018.

Advertisement

Western governments have needed the council to contemplate adjustments that might encourage U.S. reinvolvement after the Trump administration denounced the physique as a “cesspool” of anti-Israel bias.

These diplomats need the council to rethink why Israel is the one nation handled as a standing merchandise on its agenda. In addition they hope to introduce more durable guidelines for council membership, one other situation cited by the Trump administration when it pulled out.

Advertisement

A council president aligned with states hostile to reform can be able to steer the council towards different enterprise, sidelining American pursuits alongside the best way. Although the council president has little direct authority, the particular person can considerably affect its priorities.

It has been led for the previous yr by the Austrian ambassador Elisabeth Tichy-Fisslberger, who has been identified for her persistence and adroit management. The council had risked shutting down throughout the Covid-19 pandemic, however as a substitute it accomplished two classes, resulting in motion on high-profile points starting from racism in the US to human rights abuses in Venezuela.

Advertisement

Fiji’s prime minister, Frank Bainimarama, removed from backing down, has been contacting fellow Pacific Island leaders to rally help for his nation’s candidacy.

On Thursday, the Marshall Islands stated it will reject any candidate however Fiji and demanded a gathering of the Asia-Pacific group to kind the matter out. Qatar, which is at odds with Saudi Arabia, stated it will additionally oppose the candidacy of Bahrain and its ambassador, Yusuf Abdulkarim Bucheeri.

Advertisement

That might set the stage for a vote by the bloc within the coming weeks.



Source link

Advertisement
Advertisement

Related Articles

Back to top button